Skip to main content (press enter to focus)

Capital at risk -- demo environment only.

This public experience streams signed, sandboxed market data for illustrative purposes. No live trading or performance guarantees.

Technical Deep Dives
Feb 15, 2025
6 min read

Latency Optimization in High-Frequency Trading Systems

How we achieve sub-150ms p95 latency for market data ingestion and order execution. Every millisecond matters in algorithmic trading.

R
Research Team
Research Team Lead

Latency Optimization in High-Frequency Trading

Why Latency Matters

In algorithmic trading, latency isn't just a performance metric—it's a competitive advantage. The difference between 50ms and 150ms can mean:

  • Missing arbitrage opportunities that exist for 100-500ms
  • Worse execution prices due to market movement
  • Reduced ability to react to flash crashes
  • Lower signal-to-noise ratio in microstructure analysis

Our target: Sub-150ms p95 latency end-to-end (market data → signal → order execution)

Our Latency Budget

Breaking down our 150ms target:

ComponentTargetActual (p95)
Market data ingestion20ms<10ms
Order book processing30ms15-20ms
Signal generation40ms25-35ms
Risk checks20ms10-15ms
Order routing40ms30-40ms
Total150ms90-120ms

We maintain 30ms+ headroom for spikes and degradation under load.

WebSocket Streams: Sub-Millisecond Updates

Why WebSockets Over Polling

HTTP Polling (traditional approach):

  • Poll exchange every 100-500ms
  • Miss trades between polls
  • Server overhead from constant requests
  • Typical latency: 200-1000ms

WebSocket Streams (our approach):

  • Push-based: exchange sends updates instantly
  • No missed data
  • Persistent connection, lower overhead
  • Typical latency: <10ms p95

Multi-Exchange Aggregation

We maintain WebSocket connections to 10+ exchanges simultaneously, consolidating order books in real-time for arbitrage detection and best execution routing.

Event-Driven Architecture

Asynchronous Processing

Instead of blocking sequential execution, we use async/await patterns:

```python async def trading_pipeline(): # Fetch data and run risk prechecks in parallel data_task = asyncio.create_task(fetch_market_data()) risk_task = asyncio.create_task(precheck_limits())

data, risk_status = await asyncio.gather(data_task, risk_task)

if risk_status.ok:
    signals = await generate_signals(data)
    await execute_orders(signals)

Total: ~80ms with parallelization vs 100ms sequential

```

Signal Generation Optimization

Columnar Storage for Speed

Using Apache Arrow + Polars for lightning-fast time-series operations:

  • 10-100x faster than Pandas
  • SIMD vectorization for calculations
  • Zero-copy data sharing
  • Lazy evaluation for efficiency

```python import polars as pl

Fast VWAP calculation

df = pl.scan_parquet("trades/*.parquet") vwap = ( df.filter(pl.col("timestamp") > cutoff) .select([ (pl.col("price") * pl.col("volume")).sum() / pl.col("volume").sum() ]) .collect() # Execute in parallel )

Typical time: <10ms for 1M rows

```

Cached Computations

Pre-computing expensive calculations and caching with 60s TTL:

  • Cache hit: <1ms
  • Cache miss: 20-30ms
  • Hit rate: 85-90% in production

Order Execution Speed

Direct WebSocket Order Placement

Instead of REST API calls, we use WebSocket connections for order placement:

  • REST API: 50-100ms latency
  • WebSocket: 30-80ms latency
  • Reduction: 20-40ms per order

Smart Order Routing

We route to the fastest available exchange with sufficient liquidity:

```python def select_exchange(symbol, liquidity_needed): candidates = [] for exchange in active_exchanges: if exchange.get_liquidity(symbol) >= liquidity_needed: candidates.append({ 'exchange': exchange, 'latency': exchange.avg_latency_p95, 'fee': exchange.taker_fee })

# Sort by latency, then fee
return sorted(candidates, key=lambda x: (x['latency'], x['fee']))[0]

```

Production Performance Metrics

Our live system achieves:

  • Order book update latency: <10ms p95
  • Signal generation: <35ms end-to-end
  • Order execution: <100ms to exchange
  • Total round-trip: 90-120ms p95

Comparison to Industry

Platform TypeTypical LatencyOur LatencyAdvantage
Retail bots500-2000ms90-120ms4-20x faster
Pro platforms200-500ms90-120ms2-5x faster
HFT firms (co-located)1-50msN/ADifferent league

We're dramatically faster than retail/pro platforms without requiring expensive co-location.

Real-World Impact

Arbitrage Capture

With 90-120ms latency:

  • ✅ Capture 60-70% of arbitrage opportunities (exist for 100-500ms)
  • ✅ Execute before prices converge
  • ✅ Sufficient speed for cross-exchange strategies

Flash Crash Response

During flash crashes:

  • Market drops 5-10% in seconds
  • Our system detects and responds in <500ms
  • Cancels orders, flattens positions, waits for stability
  • Re-enters at discounted prices opportunistically

Microstructure Signal Quality

Faster latency = fresher data:

  • Order flow imbalance (OFI) calculations use <50ms old data
  • VPIN calculated on near-real-time volume buckets
  • Microprice reflects current market conditions

Continuous Monitoring

We track latency metrics 24/7 with alerting:

  • Warning: >100ms p95 (any component)
  • Critical: >150ms p95 (triggers investigation)
  • Automatic degradation: Reduce trading frequency if latency spikes

For more technical details, see our system architecture page.

Tagged:
LatencyPerformanceInfrastructure

Related Articles